8/17/2023 0 Comments Git fetch specific branchIn the same vein you can create git aliases for all snippets from this article. You can clone a single branch (and it's history) : git clone -branch -single-branch See git help clone.You can't 'add' the name of a branch in the path like that. Now you can call it via git command: $ git both-merged 1,652 7 27 46 Add a comment 3 Answers Sorted by: 16 Like the error message tells you, git clone expects a git repository. This snippet shows only local merged branches, which have appropriate remote merged branches: $ comm -12 <(git branch -merged|awk '')Äonât forget to make it executable( chmod 755 git-both-merged), and you can also make a git alias for this script. Usually, itâs simple to remove local and appropriate remote branches at once. Tip for Github usersĪfter the last Github update, Branches page is divided into âYour branchesâ, âActive branchesâ and âStale branchesâ, and it shows same information as previous commands. Because pull performs a merge on the retrieved changes, you should ensure that your local work is committed. git pull is a convenient shortcut for completing both git fetch and git merge in the same command: git pull REMOTE-NAME BRANCH-NAME Grabs online updates and merges them with your local work. Implies -single-branch unless -no-single-branch is given. This list should be reviewed more thoroughly to avoid losing important commits. Pulling changes from a remote repository. depth Create a shallow clone with a history truncated to the specified number of commits.This indicator also shows you the number of unpushed local commits. Git submodules are actually using the commit rev of another repository and you. Similar snippet for not merged branches: $ for branch in `git branch -r -no-merged | grep -v HEAD` do echo -e `git show -format="%ci %cr %an" $branch | head -n 1` $branch done | sort -r When you fetch a branch, the Git Changes window has an indicator under the branch drop-down, which displays the number of unpulled commits from the remote branch. Now, you can delete own remote branches, and ask other authors to clean-up theirs: $ git push origin -delete branch-name This magic snippet provides all required information: $ for branch in `git branch -r -merged | grep -v HEAD` do echo -e `git show -format="%ci %cr %an" $branch | head -n 1` $branch done | sort -r Would be cool to know last commit date and author. What if this branch is merged, but still used for feature development. Usually, remote repository is a big garbage heap of stale branches, if there is no responsible housekeeping person.Īfter previous git remote prune origin we should have synched list of remote branches.Īt first, we can find branches which are already merged in âmasterâ: $ git checkout masterÄ«ut this command does not provide much information. List referenced remote branches: $ git branch -rĬlean-up outdated references: $ git remote prune originĪnd Git automatically prunes all stale references. If some of them is just abandoned stuff that you donât need anymore, remove it with â-Dâ option: $ git branch -D old-abandoned-featureĪfter each git pull or git fetch command Git creates references to remote branches in local repository, but doesnât clean up stale references. Next, decide what to do with not merged branches: $ git branch -no-merged Now, remove all outdated branches with: $ git branch -d old-merged-feature We need to know what branches are already merged in âmasterâ and can be easily removed: $ git checkout master gitconfig Local branchesĪt first, list all local branches: $ git branch I mean, I guess I could come up with a single arbitrary local branch name to always pull the commits down into, and then delete that branch after every push, but that's seems inelegant.5 Moving stuff into. (and yes, I verified that that commit SHA exists on that remote looks like git doesn't accept a SHA here anyway). (or an equivalent git filter-repo command). I tried git fetch 7d0969daba1fdf9d5bb9bc9a2847fd1bc1c7e426Ä®rror: no such remote ref 12819ad8e10e5906df5352d7d8fec1fceb1f3afc git filter-branch -tag-name-filtercat master branch1 branch2 tag1 tag2. Git pull implicitly involves a merge or rebase, so that's out of the question. So, how do I just grab the given remote commit (and any of its parent commits that are new to me) and add it/them to my local git database? To only git clone a specific branch and no others. And I don't want to change the HEADs of any of my local branches. The two most common ways to use git clone branch are: To check out a specific branch after the git clone. The source repo will vary and these are all one-shot operations, so I don't want to git remote add these remotes and I don't want to create refs/branches for the commits. So, what I'm basically trying to do is to pull down a given commit (identified by its SHA) from one remote repo, and then push it to another remote repo as a new branch (whose name I autogenerate).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |